Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products

Published by: Kowsar

Tailored Hydrogel Microbeads of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose as a Carrier to Deliver Mefenamic Acid: Transmucosal Administration

Babak Shirizadeh 1 , 2 , Maryam Maghsoodi 1 , 3 , * , Mitra Alami-Milani 1 , 2 , Sara Salatin 1 , 4 and Mitra Jelvehgari 1 , 3 , **
Authors Information
1 Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Research Center for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Corresponding Authors:
Article information
  • Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products: November 2017, 12 (4); e65324
  • Published Online: November 30, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 13, 2016
  • Revised: February 14, 2017
  • Accepted: November 14, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjnpp.65324

To Cite: Shirizadeh B, Maghsoodi M, Alami-Milani M, Salatin S, Jelvehgari M. Tailored Hydrogel Microbeads of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose as a Carrier to Deliver Mefenamic Acid: Transmucosal Administration, Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2017 ; 12(4):e65324. doi: 10.5812/jjnpp.65324.

Abstract
Copyright © 2017, Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Khurana S, Madhav NS, Tangri P. Mucoadhesive drug delivery, mechanism and methods of evaluation. Int J Pharm Biosci. 2011;2:458-67.
  • 2. Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery--a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release. 2006;114(1):15-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.012. [PubMed: 16828915].
  • 3. Shinkar DM, Dhake AS, Setty CM. Drug delivery from the oral cavity: a focus on mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012;66(5):466-500. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2012.00877. [PubMed: 23035030].
  • 4. Shojaei AH, Li X. Mechanisms of buccal mucoadhesion of novel copolymers of acrylic acid and polyethylene glycol monomethylether monomethacrylate. J Control Release. 1997;47(2):151-61. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(96)01626-4.
  • 5. Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89(7):850-66. doi: 10.1002/1520-6017(200007)89:7<850::AID-JPS2>3.0.CO;2-G. [PubMed: 10861586].
  • 6. Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.028. [PubMed: 18984051].
  • 7. Kashyap N, Kumar N, Kumar MN. Hydrogels for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2005;22(2):107-49. [PubMed: 15862110].
  • 8. Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZN, Nath RA, Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: An overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010;1(4):381-7. doi: 10.4103/0110-5558.76436. [PubMed: 22247877].
  • 9. Chavanke PP, Milind DW. A review on ionotropic gelation method: novel approach for controlled gastroretentive gelispheres. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4:27-32.
  • 10. Mura P, Corti G, Cirri M, Maestrelli F, Mennini N, Bragagni M. Development of mucoadhesive films for buccal administration of flufenamic acid: Effect of cyclodextrin complexation. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(7):3019-29. doi: 10.1002/jps.22068. [PubMed: 20127823].
  • 11. Flower RJ. The development of COX2 inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(3):179-91. doi: 10.1038/nrd1034.
  • 12. Joo Y, Kim HS, Woo RS, Park CH, Shin KY, Lee JP, et al. Mefenamic acid shows neuroprotective effects and improves cognitive impairment in in vitro and in vivo Alzheimer's disease models. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(1):76-84. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.015206. [PubMed: 16223958].
  • 13. Benet LZ, Kroetz D, Sheiner L, Hardman J, Limbird L. Goodman and gilmans the pharmacological basis of therap. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 1996. Pharmacokinetics, the dynamics of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination; p. 3-27.
  • 14. Sevgi F, Kaynarsoy B, Ertan G. An anti-inflammatory drug (mefenamic acid) incorporated in biodegradable alginate beads: development and optimization of the process using factorial design. Pharm Dev Technol. 2008;13(1):5-13. doi: 10.1080/10837450701702339. [PubMed: 18300095].
  • 15. Roy S, Panpalia SG, Nandy BC, Rai VK, Tyagi LK, Dey S, et al. Effect of method of preparation on chitosan microspheres of mefenamic acid. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res. 2009;1(1):36-42. doi: 10.25004/ijpsdr.2009.010109.
  • 16. Liu CH, Kao YH, Chen SC, Sokoloski TD, Sheu MT, Woodhouse K, et al. The pharmacokinetics of non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1987;12(111-22). doi: 10.2165/00003088-198712020-00002. [PubMed: 3549104].
  • 17. Khazaeli P, Pardakhty A, Hassanzadeh F. Formulation of ibuprofen beads by ionotropic gelation. Iran J Pharmaceu Res. 2010;7:163-70.
  • 18. Lohani A, Singh G, Bhattacharya SS, Hegde RR, Verma A. Tailored interpenetrating polymer network beads of κ-carrageenan and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose for controlled drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Tech. 2016;31:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst2015.11.005.
  • 19. Patel N, Lalwani D, Gollmer S, Injeti E, Sari Y, Nesamony J. Development and evaluation of a calcium alginate based oral ceftriaxone sodium formulation. Prog Biomater. 2016;5:117-33. doi: 10.1007/s40204-016-0051-9. [PubMed: 27525203].
  • 20. Channawar MA, Chandewar AV, Kshirsagar MD. Development and in vitro characterization of buccoadhesive diltiazem tablet. J Pharm Res. 2012;5:908-12. [PubMed: 20158046].
  • 21. Jelvehgari M, Valizadeh H, Jalali Motlagh R, Montazam H. Formulation and physicochemical characterization of buccoadhesive microspheres containing diclofenac sodium. Adv Pharm Bull. 2014;4(3):295-301. doi: 10.5681/apb.2014.043. [PubMed: 24754015].
  • 22. Thulasiramaraju T, Kumar BT, Kumar AK, Naresh T. Bucco-adhesive drug delivery system: a novel drug delivery technique. Asian J Res Biolog Pharm Sci Sys. 2013;1(1):28-46.
  • 23. Sonar GS, Jain DK, More DM. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of bilayer and floating bioadhesive tablets of rosiglitazone maleate. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2007;2:161-9.
  • 24. Shidhaye SS, Saindane NS, Sutar S, Kadam V. Mucoadhesive bilayered patches for administration of sumatriptan succinate. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(3):909-16. doi: 10.1208/s12249-008-9125-x. [PubMed: 18679806].
  • 25. Bravo SA, Lamas MC, Salamon CJ. In-vitro studies of diclofenac sodium controlled-release from biopolymeric hydrophilic matrices. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2002;5(3):213-9. [PubMed: 12553888].
  • 26. Yeo Y, Park K. Control of encapsulation efficiency and initial burst in polymeric microparticle systems. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27(1):1-12. [PubMed: 14969330].
  • 27. Hoare TR, Kohane DS. Hydrogels in drug delivery, progress and challenges. Polymer. 2008;49(8):1993-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027.
  • 28. Jyothi NV, Prasanna PM, Sakarkar SN, Prabha KS, Ramaiah PS, Srawan GY. Microencapsulation techniques, factors influencing encapsulation efficiency. J Microencapsul. 2010;27(3):187-97. doi: 10.3109/02652040903131301. [PubMed: 20406093].
  • 29. Patel H, Srinatha A, Sridhar BK. External cross-linked mucoadhesive microbeads for prolonged drug release, development and in vitro characterization. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2014;76(5):437-44. [PubMed: 25425758].
  • 30. Manjanna KM, Rajesh KS, Shivakumar B. Formulation and optimization of natural polysaccharide hydrogel microbeads of aceclofenac sodium for oral controlled drug delivery. Am J Med Sci Med. 2013;1(1):5-17. doi: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-2.
  • 31. Chatterji J, Borchardt JK. Applications of water soluble polymers in the oil field. J Petroleum Tech. 2013;33(11):2042-56. doi: 10.2118/9288-pa.
  • 32. Bajpai S, Sharma S. Investigation of swelling/degradation behaviour of alginate beads crosslinked with Ca 2+ and Ba 2+ ions. React Func Poly. 2004;59:129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolm.2004.01.002.
  • 33. Ozguney I. Conventional and novel pharmaceutical dosage forms on prevention of gastric ulcers. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2011. Peptic ulcer disease; p. 323-50.
  • 34. Mouryaa VK, Inamdar NN, Tiwari A. Carboxymethyl chitosan and its applications. Adv Mat Lett. 2010;1(1):11-33. doi: 10.5185/amlett.2010.3108.
  • 35. Ahuja A, Khar RK, Ali J. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;23(5):489-515. doi: 10.3109/03639049709148498.
  • 36. Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.001. [PubMed: 16198441].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments